While one person is appointed to head the jury his or

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: motivated them to fulfill their work. The fact that anyone who dose not accomplish his or her assigned work thus affect the whole progress of the project could be easily detected, gives the necessary pressure to workers that guarantee the efficiency thus the completion of the progect. View2: the claim that the everybody decision making structure rather than central authority is a more effective way to get things down is unwarranted. Evidence: Everybody makes decisions totally no decisions. Not everyone has acquired the essential abilities such as thorough analysis and foresighted prediction to make decisions. Which is a more productive method of performing a group task: allowing all group members to share in the decision making, duties and responsibilities, or appointing one member to make decisions, delegate duties and take responsibility? The speaker’s opinion is that the first method is always the best one. In my view, however, each of these alternatives is viable in certain circumstances, as illustrated by two very different examples. A jury in a criminal trial is good example of a group in which shared decision­making,...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/05/2009 for the course ECAS asdfasdf taught by Professor Asdfaf during the Spring '09 term at Academy of Art University.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online