Pennsylvania Coal Co vs. Mahon et Al.

Pennsylvania Coal Co vs. Mahon et Al. - Risk now a danger,...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Econ 404 5/12/2009 rmf34 Pennsylvania Coal Co. vs. Mahon et Al. Judge(s): Justice Homes, Justice Brandeis Court: US Supreme Court (Location, Date): PA, Dec 1922 Plaintiff: Pennsylvania Coal Co. Case Summary: Mahon purchased property whose previous owner had sold the right to sub-surface mining to. He knew this and now his structures were in danger of collapsing. Coal company says too bad. Now Kohler act of 1921 says can’t mine if it will cause damage to human habitation buildings.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Risk now a danger, can’t give the coal company more than they purchased. Defense: Mahon et Al. Verdict: Mahon wins, in protecting the public from harm, there is no need to compensate for lost coal profit. Just the same as say growing drugs or producing illegal alcohol. This harms the property owner if he could be using his land to make money, still this harms the public and it is not compensated for. Law and Economics Notes:...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/11/2007 for the course ECON 4040 taught by Professor Hay during the Fall '07 term at Cornell.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online