Ploof vs. Putnam - family members. This is a case of...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Econ 404 5/7/2009 rmf34 Ploof vs. Putnam Judge(s): Munson Court: Supreme Court of Vermont (Location, Date): Lake Champlain October 1908 Plaintiff: Putnam Case Summary: Putnam, island owner unmoored Ploof’s ship as it docked on his island in lake Champlain during a fierce storm. The ship was docked to prevent damage and it was unmoored by Putnam’s servant and it crashed onto the shore and injured Ploof’s
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: family members. This is a case of necessity, to preserve human life is more important and overrides a trespass charge. Defense: Ploof Verdict: Putnam is guilty, because he unmoored the sloop, and it was necessary to dock somewhere, sure Ploof could have docked somewhere else, but it doesnt matter. This is crucial to save human lives. Law and Economics Notes:...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/11/2007 for the course ECON 4040 taught by Professor Hay during the Fall '07 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Ask a homework question - tutors are online