Shell Oil vs. Marinello - The law must read that a...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Econ 404 5/6/2009 rmf34 Shell Oil vs. Marinello Judge(s): Sillivan, J. Court: Supreme court of NJ (Location, Date): July 1973 Plaintiff: Shell Oil Case Summary: Shell supplies it’s stations with gas and products. The station is purchased as a franchise. A yearly contract is renewed and if the franchise is not meeting standards, it can be shut down. In this case, a franchise owned since 1959 was shut down in 1973. Shell said that it wasn’t meeting standards, but evidence showed that it was.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: The law must read that a franchise must not be performing its obligations in order to be shut down. This prevents a huge imbalance of power. If the parent company can shut franchises down at will, there is a huge windfall loss for the franchise owner who invested time and money and customer report. Defense: Marinello Verdict: Marinello was unrightfully shut down. Law and Economics Notes:...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/11/2007 for the course ECON 4040 taught by Professor Hay during the Fall '07 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Ask a homework question - tutors are online