Legal Writing 604 Final Examination, Sanchez-1.docx - 1 Legal Writing 604 Final Examination Sanchez 20177 Essay#1 Sammy decided she was ready to sell

Legal Writing 604 Final Examination, Sanchez-1.docx - 1...

This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 16 pages.

Legal Writing 604, Final Examination, Sanchez, # 20177Essay #1 Sammy decided she was ready to sell her classic sports car. On May 1and in the following order, she telephoned Bob, Carl, Dan, and Edna,each of whom had earlier expressed interest in buying the car. She wasunable to make actual contact with any of them, so she left thefollowing message on each one’s telephone answering machine: “I’mready to sell my car, which I know you’ve expressed interest in. Theprice is $10,000. My offer is good until the end of today, May 1. Ifyou’re still interested, call me back by the end of today so I’ll know forsure.” Bob, Carl, and Dan each called back at a time when Sammy was outrunning errands. They each left a message on Sammy’s telephoneanswering machine. Bob’s message said, “The price is pretty high, so I’ll have to thinkabout it.” Carl’s message said, “I think the price is too high, but I’d be willing topay you $9,000.”Dan’s message said, “OK, I’ll pay your price but only if you’ll let metake the car to my mechanic so he can check it out first.” Edna, rather than call Sammy back, mailed Sammy a letter on May 1stating, “I got your message, and I accept your offer and will pay$10,000.” On May 2, Sammy died. Doug was appointed as executor for Sammy’sestate, and as such had all powers to deal with the estate property.Bob, Carl, Dan, and Edna each said to Doug, “I accepted Sammy’s offeron May 1, and, in any event, I will buy the car as is and for Sammy’sasking price.” Doug tells them each that their so-called acceptanceswere not valid and that their power of acceptance has alreadyterminated. Is Doug correct? Explain fully in an IRAC outline answer?Was there a valid offer by Sammy on May 1?Bob v. Doug(Sammy's Estate)1
The rights and remedies of 4 prospects interested in buying Sammy'sclassic sports car, toally depend on the contact was still valid. A validcontract totally depends on a valid offer, acceptance, and legalconsideration. In Contracts, it is governed by the UCC. The 4 prospects aren'tmerchant's being casual buyers, and under contract law, Statue ofFrauds states that sales over $500 must be in writing.Offer- An offer is an outward manifestationof present intent and willingnessto enter into a bargain, so that an offeree would know that his assent isinvited and would conclude it.Sammy's offer has a list of essentials of it being a valid offer: A classicsports car, ready to sell, the parties involved are Doug( Sammy'sEstate), for the price of $10,000. You need to tie in your elements inorder to support your analysisTherefore, since all of the essentials or elements in making thetransaction a valid offer are present.AcceptanceAcceptance is the unequivocal asset to the term of the offer.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture