Ethics Session 2 - Ethical Decision-Making.pdf - Ethics Module Session 2 Ethical Decision-Making FEAA 200 Introduction to Engineering and Architecture

Ethics Session 2 - Ethical Decision-Making.pdf - Ethics...

This preview shows page 1 - 18 out of 50 pages.

Session 2: Ethical Decision-Making FEAA 200: Introduction to Engineering and Architecture Fall 2016 Dr. Nadine Moacdieh Department of Industrial Engineering and Management September 6, 2015 Ethics Module
Image of page 1
Outline of this module Engineering Ethics 1. Responsibility of Engineers 2. Ethical Decision-Making 3. Ethics and Technology
Image of page 2
Moral dilemma: A situation where you have to select between two or more actions and it is not clear which one is morally right Could be moral reasons for choosing each option Could be moral reasons for NOT choosing each option Moral dilemma
Image of page 3
The trolley example Moral dilemma What would you do?
Image of page 4
The trolley example, part 2 Moral dilemma What would you do?
Image of page 5
You are going to build a new highway to reduce traffic, but this would mean destroying several houses. Moral dilemmas What would you do?
Image of page 6
Engineers have responsibilities towards their employers and society Conflicts of responsibility may arise How do engineers know what to do in the face of a moral dilemma? Ethics theories Codes of conduct Moral dilemmas for engineers
Image of page 7
Maximizing happiness Utilitarianism : founded by Jeremy Bentham in the 18 th century
Image of page 8
An action is right if it results in the maximum happiness and least harm for the largest number Put a price on everything Maximize benefits Minimize costs Maximizing happiness
Image of page 9
Utilitarian approach to the trolley example: Flip the switch (or push the man) Maximizing happiness
Image of page 10
Utilitarian approach to the highway example: Build the highway Maximizing happiness
Image of page 11
Advantages Simple and straightforward A lot of people are happy Limitations How can we tell if something gives a person “happiness” or not? How can we compare different actions? Is it right to harm a few people for the sake of many people’s happiness ? Maximizing happiness
Image of page 12
Rights of people Categorical imperative : developed by Immanuel Kant in the 18 th century
Image of page 13
Do not use people in order to reach a certain goal, no matter what the goal is Even if the goal is the happiness of others Respect each person’s rights regardless of who these people are Rights of people
Image of page 14
Kantian approach to the trolley example: Do not flip the switch Rights of people
Image of page 15
Kantian approach to the highway example: Do not build the highway Rights of people
Image of page 16
Advantages Protect everyone’s rights Disadvantages Possibly less overall benefits Rights of people
Image of page 17
Image of page 18

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 50 pages?

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture