Intl Pol of Middle East Class Notes.docx - U np thurs final 5\/10 12-1:50pm tues march 6th 12:00pm midterm 4\/24-26 student presentations take notes on

Intl Pol of Middle East Class Notes.docx - U np thurs final...

This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 64 pages.

U np41/23/18 thurs final 5/10 12-1:50pm tues march 6 th 12:00pm midterm 4/24-26 student presentations take notes on each reading Breanna = ta Charles smith reading = get started early, dense Ny times middle east section Compare one event from an American liberal newspaper/british source, how wildly the sources differ = possible midterm prompt 3/8 Charles Smith reading chart Yishuv ;Palestinians ;Egypt ;Iraq ;Syria ;Britain ;France; Russia ; US US Russia France Suez War 73 82 war 1 chart for each crisis ( US replaces Britain for some of these, Algeria will be in some of these) 1/25 Roderic H. Davison reading In the beginning, Balkans were included in the middle east. Hogarth uses the term “near east”: near to the westerners. Middle east : delineating borders for somebody else’s policy requirements. In the previous centuries, the ottoman empire had this power of determining where everything is . according to them, they lumped countries together. When they were in power, they did this. Since the beginning of last century, we refer to countries as near or far according to somewhere. The westerners started to have power to define geography of easterners late 1800s. they got their information from travel logs, missionaries, other means of getting info thru world exhibitions 1800s-early 1900s. this new knowledge of geography shaped foreign policies. Bc of the requirements of wwii , US started to have interest in the middle east thru business relations. Christian missionaries as a humanitarian cause before business relations. o Main point of this was to get the American Christian ways of thinking aligned with the ottoman empire’s Christian ways of thinking o American high schools were established o Were also there to Christianize populations ( Kurds, arabs.) done through schools From an ideological perspective history goes back to 1850s
Dynamic borders: nobody knows really where these borders are. You have a certain foreign policy and you need delineated middle east region. Becomes evident in cold war when players in the region (host) us for interference Eisenhower Doctrine 1757 – ME borders o (Libya – accommodation) o w/o Congress approval. 1 st document that legitimizes sending troops to middle east. It’s like giving supreme powers to president. o Notion of intervention – sending troops to a place in distress that supports US, starts with this doctrine. Need to know where to send troops in this intervention, so borders important -Term “Middle East” is not clearly delineated throughout time consistently -resource politics, geographic research -American foreign policy making is going to have a say in the naming of the region, just as before Britain had before the cold war, Russia as well-soon enough -Power relation between defining region as such. There is a battle when it comes to definition?

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture