Wk2AssgnBoyerL.docx - IT PROPOSAL 1 IT VENDOR PROPOSAL Lori...

This preview shows page 1 - 4 out of 8 pages.

IT PROPOSAL1IT VENDOR PROPOSALLori BoyerMMHA 6600-Healthcare Informatics and Technology ManagementWalden UniversityJune 6th, 2018
IT PROPOSAL2Appendix ASWOT Project Reviewing the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities & Threats of 3 VendorsATHENAHEALTHECLINICAL WORKSALLSCRIPTS SACSTRENGTHS-Athena health has the best effectiveness & productivity overother EMR’s, currently rated 7.1 out of 8 (p. 4) --Lots of templates available (p. 4)-E-prescribing is fast-Simple to use problem lists-More than half of users have used for 4 or more years (Healthit, 2015).-Above average ratings reported for physician effectiveness, productivity, and visually pleasing-Above average ratings reported for e-prescribing, med reconciliation, physician documentation, problem lists, CDS & Mobile app use ranked 7.1-Equal provider/vendor contribution (Healthit,2015).-More frequent updates (EHR, 2018).-Used by over 85,000 providers (EHR, 2018). -Practice management solutions with low upfront cost (EHR, 2018).-Ambulatory EMR for practices of 11-75 physicians ranked 86.7 (Klas report 2018).-Practice Management of 11-75 providers ranked 87.2 (Klas Rprt, 2018)-Effective & more productive for providers with moderate to significant usability improvements overall rating 6.4 (p.4) -E-prescribing works well (p. 157)-Current ranking of 4th compare to previous ranking of 8th-62% of users more than 5 years (Healthit, 2015)-50% moderate improvements to usability-Good decision support (p. 197)-Initial On-site training (EHR, 2018)-Customization for small practices (EHR, 2018)-Virtual visits thru telemedicine (EHR, 2018).-Ranked best of the best in Ambulatory EHR functionality & Performances (2014)-Primary serves small to medium size practice in healthcare industry-Currently rated 7.1 for e-prescribing, medreconciliation, physician documentation, and problem lists (EHR, 2018)-High level of usability(p. 12). -Voice recognition for dictation-Easy use of e-scripts(p.22)-In use with providers for 30+ years (EHR, 2018)-Open platform (EHR, 2018)WEAKNESSES-difficult to use face sheets, -Lack of templates; too -Limited problem lists
IT PROPOSAL3multiple clicks-Med reconciliation only shows all prescribed meds (p.164)-Decision support is focused on medications-Slow mobile data app-Stagnant user improvement over the past two years-Inability to individualize system based on provider or practice need (p. 175)-Not adaptable with multiple specialties (p. 141) -Cannot prescribe controlled drugs on e-prescribe-Delays in faxed RX’s to retrieve info (p. 164)

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture