This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Today *Admin *Spring Break next week! *Paper 2 to be handed back in lecture on Mon, Mar 24 *Reliability and Validity Last Time *Hypothesis Testing Review Reliability and Validity *Validity = accuracy *actually studying the variables intended to be manipulated or measured *Reliability = consistency and dependability *the consistency, stability, or repeatability of a behavior Reliability *Is there consistency and consensus in what variable measures? *A watch that runs correctly but is set 94 minutes fast is low in validity, but high in reliability Perfect Reliability *Perfect reliability means that the scores are perfectly consistent. Good Reliability *Reliability deteriorates when the consistency is lost. *Here the rank orderings are still reasonably consistent. Fair Reliability *As reliability deteriorates further, the rank orderings from the two testings are less similar. Methods of Assessing Reliability *Test-retest *Interrater reliability *Interitem reliability *Internal consistency *Split-half *Cronbachs alpha Measurement Error *measurement error *inaccuracy that exists when measuring a characteristic or behavior Effect of Measurement Error *X = T + e *Note that the average isnt affected by random erroronly the variability Validity *Does variable measure what its supposed to? *A watch that tells good time has high validity *A watch that runs correctly but is set 94 minutes fast has low validity *A broken watch will be valid twice a day Validity *Does variable measure what its supposed to?*Does variable measure what its supposed to?...
View Full Document
- Spring '08
- Experimental Psychology