dutoit case.pdf - THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF...

This preview shows page 1 - 4 out of 24 pages.

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No:006/08 SELVIN PILLAY First Appellant MAKGALA SOLOMON MOTLANTHE Second Appellant and IQBAL SHAIK First Respondent EDWARD JOHN HAMMOND Second Respondent MAURICE LESLIE WENHAM Third Respondent LUCA GIOVANNI LIVIERO Fourth Respondent AHMED SAEED VAWDA Fifth Respondent MICHAEL HUGH BLAKE Sixth Respondent SWALEDALE 9 INVESTMENTS CC Seventh Respondent MTR TRADING CC Eighth Respondent MOONEY FORD ATTORNEYS Ninth Respondent DUSKY DOLPHINS SHAREBLOCK (PTY) LTD Tenth Respondent THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND CLOSE CORPORATIONS, PRETORIA Eleventh Respondent THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS, PIETERMARITZBURG Twelfth Respondent Neutral citation: Pillay v Shaik (006/08) [2008] ZASCA 159 (27 November 2008) Coram: FARLAM, LEWIS, JAFTA, MAYA JJA et KGOMO AJA Heard: 3 NOVEMBER 2008 Delivered: 27 November 2008 Summary: Contract – formalities – whether agreements of sale between parties invalid because prospective seller did not sign – application of doctrine of quasi-mutual assent.
Image of page 1