Unformatted text preview: textbooks and a devout Roman Catholic.“ What the writer fails to mention is that Kenneth Miller, in addition to being an evolutionist, is himself an advocate for ID. His entire tone was harsh and unfair to anyone who didn’t agree with him. In the latter article, Mr. Wilson emphasizes the fact that supporters of evolution and ID should just accept the fact that they are both different subjects entirely, shake hands and forget the whole thing and leave it as it is. What both articles articulate is that there is overwhelming scientific proof for evolution. Not only is that not entirely true, but there is arguably more proof for ID. For example, if an outside, unbiased observer were to look at the complexity of the human eye, he would probably conclude that there was a designer who knew what he was doing when he made it. I doubt one would come to the conclusion that it happened by chance....
View Full Document
- Spring '08
- Evolution, Intelligent design, Edward O. Wilson, Kenneth Miller