94%(64)60 out of 64 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 5 pages.
Why do the authors of Document 1 and Document 2 believe it is necessary to strictly defineAmericans, and promote efforts to assimilate, or “Americanize,” immigrants in the UnitedStates? How do President Theodore Roosevelt and Senator Smith’s arguments differ? Doyou find their arguments persuasive? Why or why not? Based upon Document 3, howmight Woody Guthrie respond to each of those proposals?From both the excerpts, it is quite clear that the authors stand on the same agenda ofensuring the individuality of being an American citizen, which should not be tainted by anymeans. In document 1 President Roosevelt clearly conveys the point that any person who isunwilling to give up their nationality and accept America as their country and let go of thecountry from where they came cannot be a 100% American. As long as they have ties to theircountries they will not be regarded as a citizen of the united states. The similar kind of point ofview is stated in document two but it focuses more on the image of an American to the rest of theworld d. Roosevelt clearly wants an ideal image of Americans in the world which cannot beachieved if the immigrants cannot meld themselves in the image of an America. As a foreignermyself in the united states I personally don’t find their arguments persuasive for the very factthat I believe in the individuality of a person. Over the past 200 years America has blossomedand has become a garden with variety of flowers which is more radiant and if you just pretendthe same garden with just one flower no matter how beautiful it is will never accumulate to thebeauty and radiance of 100 different flowers blooming together. Woody Guthrie would defiantlyhave a negative response to both their proposals as it clearly shows from his poem, he wantseveryone to enjoy their freedom.