This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: OR 320/520 Optimization I 11/29/07 Professor Bland Integer Linear Programming (see BHM Ch. 9, Sections 1, 3, 4, 5, 8) Minimize n X j =1 c j x j s . t . n X j =1 a ij x j = b i ( i = 1 , . . . , m ) (ILP) x j ≥ 0 and integer ( j = 1 , . . . , n ) . (May maximize rather than minimizing, may have ≤ , ≥ , constraints, etc. May have some variables that are required to be integervalued, others not.) Assume a ij ’s, c j ’s b i ’s are integervalued (or, at least rational). If we drop the integrality conditions from (ILP) we get the linear programming relaxation . (ILP) has very broad applicability: • indivisible commodities • batchsizing and fixed charges • “go, nogo” decisions • logical constraints, conditional constraints • sequencing and precedence constraints • piecewiselinear approximation of nonlinear functions. ILP’s are typically much harder to solve than LP’s. Why? The set of feasible solutions is not convex, so it is hard to check optimality....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 03/30/2008 for the course ORIE 320 taught by Professor Bland during the Fall '07 term at Cornell.
 Fall '07
 BLAND

Click to edit the document details