12 Angry Men ReportTo begin with, leadership is an individual that influences a group of followers orany individuals to achieve a common goal. The influence method throughout theleadership is very necessary to be available since without influence there isn’tleadership. Leadership is the action of leading any group of people or organizationand having the ability to make change, all this happens from a leader that have avision in which leadership is also setting a new direction or vision for a group thatthey follow. A leader is the spread head for the new direction.There are 12 angry men who are jurors should take verdict of a young boy, but allof them were against the boy except one of the jurors who was defending the boy’sproblem since he has a vision and he totally won.The jury of twelve angry men, entrusted with the power to send an uneducated,teenager to the electric chair for killing his father with a switchblade knife, isliterally locked into a small room on a hot summer day until they come up with aunanimous decision either guilty or not guilty. The compelling, provocative filmexamines the twelve men’s deep-seated personal prejudices, perceptual biases andweaknesses, indifference, anger, personalities, unreliable judgments, culturaldifferences, ignorance and fears, that threaten to taint their decision-makingabilities, cause them to ignore the real issues in the case, and potentially lead themto a miscarriage of justice. The 12 angry men at the beginning were careless as ifthere were no case to discuss; they were discussing sport issues rather thanthinking about the boy.At the beginning of the play, eleven of the jurors believe that the boy killed hisfather. They summarize the evidence of the trial as so: A 45 year old womanclaimed she witnessed the defendant stabbing his father. She watched through herwindow as the city’s commuter train passed by. An old man living downstairsclaimed that he heard the boy yell “I’ll kill you” followed by a “thump” on thefloor. He then witnessed a young man, supposedly the defendant, running away.Before the murder took place, the defendant purchased a switchblade, the sametype that was used in the murder. The defendant claimed he was at the movies atthe time of the murder. He didn’t remember the names of the film.
Juror #8 picks apart each piece of evidence to persuade the others. The old mancould have invented his story because he craved attention. He also might not haveheard the boy’s voice while the train was passing by. Although the prosecutionstated that the switchblade was rare and unusual, Juror #8 purchased one just like itfrom a store in the defendant’s neighborhood. Some members of the jury decidethat during a stressful situation, anyone could forget the names of the movie theyhad seen. The 45 year old woman had indentations on her nose, indicating that shewore glasses. Because her eyesight is in question, the jury decides that she is not areliable witness.