69. Casimiro v. Tandog.pdf - SECOND DIVISION[G.R No 146137...

This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 8 pages.

SECOND DIVISION[G.R. No. 146137. June 8, 2005.]HAYDEE C. CASIMIRO, in her capacity as Municipal Assessor of SanHAYDEE C. CASIMIRO, in her capacity as Municipal Assessor of SanJose, Romblon, Province of RomblonJose, Romblon, Province of Romblon,petitioner, vsvs. FILIPINO T.. FILIPINO T.TANDOG, in his capacity as the Municipal Mayor of San Jose,TANDOG, in his capacity as the Municipal Mayor of San Jose,RomblonRomblon,respondent.D E C I S I O ND E C I S I O NCHICO-NAZARIOCHICO-NAZARIO,J p:This is a petition for review on certiorariof the Decision 1dated 31 May 2000 of theCourt of Appeals and its Resolution dated 21 November 2000 in CA-G.R. SP No. 46952,which a:rmed in totoCivil Service Commission (CSC) Resolution No. 973602 dated 12August 1997. The said CSC Resolution a:rmed the Decision of Municipal Mayor FilipinoTandog of San Jose, Romblon, >nding petitioner Haydee Casimiro guilty of dishonesty andordering her dismissal from the service.The relevant antecedents of the instant petition are as follows:Petitioner Haydee Casimiro began her service in the government as assessmentclerk in the O:ce of the Treasurer of San Jose, Romblon. In August 1983, she wasappointed Municipal Assessor.On 04 September 1996, Administrative O:cer II Nelson M. Andres, submitted areport 2based on an investigation he conducted into alleged irregularities in the o:ce ofpetitioner Casimero. The report spoke of an anomalous cancellation of Tax DeclarationsNo. 0236 in the name of Teodulo Matillano and the issuance of a new one in the name ofpetitioner's brother Ulysses Cawaling and Tax Declarations No. 0380 and No. 0376 in thename of Antipas San Sebastian and the issuance of new ones in favor of petitioner'sbrother-in-law Marcelo Molina.Immediately thereafter, respondent Mayor Tandog issued Memorandum Order No.1 3 3dated 06 September 1996, placing the petitioner under preventive suspension forthirty (30) days. Three (3) days later, Mayor Tandog issued Memorandum Order No. 15,directing petitioner to answer the charge of irregularities in her o:ce. In her answer, 4petitioner denied the alleged irregularities claiming, in essence, that the cancellation of thetax declaration in favor of her brother Ulysses Cawaling was done prior to her assumptionto o:ce as municipal assessor, and that she issued new tax declarations in favor of herbrother-in-law Marcelo Molina by virtue of a deed of sale executed by Antipas SanSebastian in Molina's favor.On 23 October 1996, thru Memorandum Order No. 17, 5respondent Mayor extendedpetitioner's preventive suspension for another thirty (30) days effective 24 October 1996to give him more time to verify and collate evidence relative to the alleged irregularities.On 28 October 1996, Memorandum Order No. 18 6was issued by respondent Mayordirecting petitioner to answer in writing the a:davit-complaint of Noraida San SebastianCD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2018cdasiaonline.com
Cesar and Teodulo Matillano. Noraida San Sebastian Cesar 7alleged that Tax DeclarationsNo. 0380 and No. 0376 covering parcels of land owned by her parents were transferred in

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture