IRAC Analysis #2.docx - IRAC Analysis Stoll vs Runyon ACCT...

This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.

IRAC Analysis Stoll vs. Runyon ACCT 261-01 I SSUES #1. The coworkers continuously saw harassment against Cynthia Stoll and other women working in the workplace. What should be done about this? #2. Being a supervisor who has learned about the sexual harassments of Cynthia Stoll. What actions could be done against such behavior? #3. Cynthia Stoll’s’ harassment was reported to human resources at Sacramento Post Office. As a human resources director what responsibilities do you have to handle this situation? #4. House counsel of the Post Office what kind of suggestions could be provided for such a case? #5. Sacramento Post Office did not comply with the Office of Federal Operations ruling on March 18, 1996. RULES #1. Any witnesses to a sexual harassment are strongly encouraged to report these activities to the supervisor. #2. The Supervisors are responsible for investigation the allegation of sexual harassment in the workplace regardless of how they received the information based on the sexual harassment.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture