plos.org create account sign in Publish o Submissions Getting Started Submission Guidelines Figures Tables Supporting Information LaTeX Revising Your Manuscript Submit Now o Policies Best Practices in Research Reporting Human Subjects Research Animal Research Competing Interests Disclosure of Funding Sources Licenses and Copyright Data Availability Materials and Software Sharing Ethical Publishing Practice Authorship Downloads and Translations o Manuscript Review and Publication Criteria for Publication Editorial and Peer Review Process Guidelines for Reviewers Accepted Manuscripts Corrections and Retractions Comments Article-Level Metrics Submit Your Manuscript Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. Learn More Submit Now
About o Why Publish with PLOS ONE o Journal Information o Staff Editors o Editorial Board o Section Editors o Advisory Groups o Publishing Information o Publication Fees o Press and Media o Contact Browse advanced search Loading metrics OPEN ACCESS PEER-REVIEWED RESEARCH ARTICLE A Comparative Analysis on Assessment of Land Carrying Capacity with Ecological Footprint Analysis and Index System Method Yao Qian, Lina Tang , Quanyi Qiu, Tong Xu, Jiangfu Liao
Published: June 29, 2015 Article Authors Metrics Comments Related Content Reader Comments (0) Media Coverage Figures Figures Abstract Land carrying capacity (LCC) explains whether the local land resources are effectively used to support economic activities and/or human population. LCC can be evaluated commonly with two approaches, namely ecological
footprint analysis (EFA) and the index system method (ISM). EFA is helpful to investigate the effects of different land categories whereas ISM can be used to evaluate the contributions of social, environmental, and economic factors. Here we compared the two LCC-evaluation approaches with data collected from Xiamen City, a typical region where rapid economic growth and urbanization are found in China. The results show that LCC assessments with EFA and ISM not only complement each other but also are mutually supportive. Both assessments suggest that decreases in arable land and increasingly high energy consumption have major negative effects on LCC and threaten sustainable development for Xiamen City. It is important for the local policy makers, planners and designers to reduce ecological deficits by controlling fossil energy consumption, protecting arable land and forest land from converting into other land types, and slowing down the speed of urbanization, and to promote sustainability by controlling rural-to-urban immigration, increasing hazard-free treatment rate of household garbage, and raising energy consumption per unit industrial added value. Although
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 24 pages?