milestone 3.docx - Final Project 1 Final Project Caitlin...

Final Project 1
Final Project
Caitlin Hogue
Southern New Hampshire University
PSY530- Social Psychology

Final Project 2
Hypothesis
During an experiment, if the administrator demands the participants hurt another, at what
point or under what conditions will they disobey? One goal of the study was to research behavior
in an intense situation involving deep consequence to the participants. The idea of this goal was
to demonstrate how psychological forces in vigorous and realistic forms of hostility may not be
influenced by diluted conditions.
Striving to return to Milgram's 'Submission to Authority' (OtA) perspective current
authentic ethical difficulties. Recently new standards have been constructed to avoid the
difficulties yet, there is a new standard that handles Milgram's own policies and asking that
innocent representatives bring the most intense degree of awe. This was finished in the current
inspection by handling the Immersive Digital Realism (IDR) to report to the OtA model.
The goal was to justify the original plea that IDR grants the investigation of people’s
behavior in intense situations. It was illustrated to display that individuals’ behaviors coincide
with the behavior observed instead of their beliefs on their behavior. The number one question
was whether or not, in IDR the degree of awe the participants carry out to simulate the behavior
of genuine participants or to the measurement of non-participants.
Literature Review
In Milgrams study, two experiments were quoted in this piece that provided to the central
motive were: experimental studies of conflict and behavioral study of obedience. In the Haslam
study, two experiments were also quoted in this piece that provided to the central motive were:
the obedience experiments: a study of difference in social science and behavioral study of
obedience. In the study, 26 out of 40 (65%) everyday Americans tolerated up to 450 volts.

Final Project 3
Haslam, Reicher, & Millard (2015) suggest that Milgram had decided that “it is not so much the
kind of person a man is as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he
will act” [2] (p. 101) and “the ordinary person who shocked the person did so out of a sense of
obligation – a conception of his duties as a subject – and not from any peculiarly aggressive
tendencies”. Milgram’s belief argues that participants were concentrated on the power, and so
obligated with the assignment of executing directions the best they can, that they forgot the
ramifications of their own behavior and of their ethical significance (Haslam, Reicher, & Millard
2015).
Methodology
The research method used for the Milgram study, was experiment. Similar to the Milgram
study, the research method used for the Haslam study, was experiment. There were 14
participants in the study and of the 14 participants 8 were men and 6 were women. The