This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: racket is be more brittle and thus would fracture more easily. When racket 3 is created with titanium, the area of tension is in a much more localized region. Based on this, this would not cause failure because the mechanical properties of titanium restrict the dispersing of the reactive force caused by the propagated crack. Based on the analysis of the tension formed by the propagation cracks, it would seem that titanium is a more appropriate material to use when it comes to resisting failure due to tensile stress. In addition, racket 3 is a sturdier piece of equipment to use when it comes to avoiding failure. By localizing the tensile regions of the cracks, it becomes less likely that fracture around the rest of the racket will occur. In contrast, the cobalt material causes extensive tension on the head of the racket, most probably causing failure. Racket 1 Cobalt crack Racket 3 Titanium...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/31/2008 for the course MSE 261 taught by Professor Sass during the Fall '06 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).
- Fall '06