reading thought questions prelim 2

reading thought questions prelim 2 - Buston & Emlen (2003)...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1. One premise of this paper is based on the argument that "a strategy more likely to lead to stable long-term pairing would be to assess one's own relative quality as a mate . .. and choose a partner of similar quality (pg. 91)"? Does this argument make sense? Is the evidence convincing? What alternative means of mate selection are there? 2. The authors test two hypotheses: a likes-attract and a reproductive-potentials-attract. What is the evidence for each? Is one more supported than the other? 3. This study relies on perceived quality of oneself as a mate and perceived quality of another as a mate. How do you think the results would change were this examined with actual self and mate quality? Fletcher et al (2004). 1. What are the sex differences in preferences for warm/trustworthiness, status/resources and attractiveness/vitality? What are the sex similarities? 2. Is there evidence that women are just choosier in their selection of mates than men? 3. Does the data presented support parental investment theory with regards to women’s short term mating preferences?
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/31/2008 for the course HD 3620 taught by Professor Campa,m. during the Fall '07 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Ask a homework question - tutors are online