100%(7)7 out of 7 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.
Discussion 3.1How do the trait theory perspectives of Allport, Eysenck, and Cattell differ? Doyou feel their research was conducted ethically? Why or why not?oWhen discussing the difference between Allport, Eysenck and Cattell it isclear that they all used different ways to analysis personalities. Accordingto Allport, he “defined traits as “generalized and personalizeddetermining tendencies—consistent and stable modes of an individual'sadjustment to his environment” (1936, p. 26).” His procedures foranalyzing material were unique to the individual case. Many felt this wasantiscientific according to the text, stating that “thinking that the study ofindividual idiosyncrasies conflicted with science’s search for general laws.”Eysenck used a three-factor theory to emphasis on biological foundationsof personality. He “recognized that trait theory could break out of suchconceptual circles by going beyond the mere use of words and identifyingbiological systems that correspond to trait.” Cattell used 16 factors to