100%(2)2 out of 2 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 1 - 4 out of 10 pages.
ASSIGNMENT #1HRMT 300Personality DimensionsProfessor: Victor IyekekpolorDate: 25 May 2019Submitted By: Mandeep Kaur (300992609)
IntroductionThis assignment is done to let one know about their personality traits or dimensions by takinga number of tests. These tests help one to evaluate their score and know more about their personality. There are numerous possible results in these tests as each person thinks differently. It is very rare to find anyone’s answers matching with others. Mostly, people havedifferent results and their scores do not most commonly match with one another.List of Tests(1) MachiavellianismPart 1: (a) Niccolò Machiavelli was an Italian lawmaker and logician in the Renaissance who is popular for his support of political morals that sees viability as progressively significant that profound quality. He is the wellspring of the expression "whatever it takes to get the job done, so be it". (b) During the 1960s, social clinicians Richard Christie and Florence L. Geis gathered explanations from Machiavelli's compositions and asked individuals the amount they concurred with each. From their examination they reasoned that Machiavellianism exists as a particular identity attribute. They distributed the MACH-IV to quantify this characteristic in 1970 and it has been a mainstream instrument from that point onward and relates with numerous things.Part 2: (a) Low Mach(b) Low Mach are on the contrary side of the Mach range and are described as being very agreeable. Those people with a low Mach direction are happy to acknowledge heading forced on them and flourish in very organized circumstances. Low Mach are less inspired by things, for example, influence, status, cash and rivalry than high Mach are. Winning isn't everything for low Mach; they work with a lot higher arrangement of moral models than their high Mach partners. I totally agree with the result that has come out of this test.[ CITATION She \l 1033 ](2)Self-Monitoring TestPart 1: (a) Self-monitoring is the capacity to both watch and assess one's conduct. Oneself observing scale estimates the degree to which an individual has the will and capacity to alter how they are seen by others. This test was created by Mark Snyder (1974).
(b) The test comprises of twenty-five things that could apply to yourself that you should rate as obvious or false. Every thing ought to be reacted to rapidly without over-considering. The test should take close to two minutes.[ CITATION Sny74 \l 1033 ]Part 2: (a) My self-monitoring score is 15(b) Yes, I agree with my score as it shows how much I take in note of my own behavior ratherthan looking at others. (3) Risk-taking testPart 1: (a) Everybody has an alternate dimension of solace with taking risks. Among others things, chance taking inclinations are affected by past involvement, condition, and potential for remuneration. In any case, even under comparative conditions, two people could undoubtedly show discrepant hazard taking conduct, giving proof to the extensive job of identity in hazard taking.