just say no-steel - Rust never sleeps Adapted from The...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Rust never sleeps Adapted from The Economist, March 2002 AN AILING steel industry, a case of unfair trade before America's International Trade Commission and a president mulling sanctions. No, this is not 2002, but 1976, when Gerald Ford was in the White House and America's sickly steel companies were clamouring for import protection to help them back on their feet. Twenty-six years later, the same steel makers are still flat on their backs. The quotas, tariffs, subsidies and the like (worth well over $30 billion, according to some estimates) that America's politicians have lavished on steel companies in the interim have clearly taught policymakers nothing. Amid widespread groans, on March 5th President George Bush slapped tariffs, ranging from 8% to 30%, on an assortment of imported steel products for three years—a period of time, ventured Mr Bush's trade representative, Robert Zoellick, “that will give the US steel industry the opportunity to get back on its feet.” The fact that the president did what everybody expected him to makes this decision no less damaging, and no less stupid. This steel-tariff plan, it is important to remember, lies well outside the ordinary run of bad economic policy: it is so wrong it makes other kinds of wealth-destroying intervention feel inadequate. And was it really politically inescapable? What a depressingly feeble excuse from a president who has promised, and shown, strong leadership in other respects, and who had claimed, by the way, to be a champion of liberal trade. Mr Bush and his advisers should be ashamed. The aim, says the administration, is to give the steel industry a breathing space—time to restructure and modernise to cope with foreign competition. Much of this competition, the industry alleges, is unfair since many foreign steel companies enjoy government subsidies. And the administration points out that firms accounting for 30% of American steel- producing capacity have filed for bankruptcy since 1998. Yet in that time, steel imports have actually declined. History suggests that the protection of the sort now being extended to the steel sector simply enables the industry concerned yet again to postpone the day of reckoning. Why protecting American steel is such a rotten idea The principal aim of the new tariffs is to raise the price of steel on the American market, and so help domestic producers who cannot compete with lower-priced imports. But since America consumes more steel than it produces; consumers would suffer far more from a tariff than producers would benefit. Also, higher-priced steel has a direct impact on American manufacturers—it puts up their production costs.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

just say no-steel - Rust never sleeps Adapted from The...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online