BUS 311Week 2 Discussion 1 & 2 ResponsesDiscussion 1 ResponsesResponse 1 (Crystal Rivera)I agree with you that the terms were in Campbell favor which explains that Wentz couldonly sell red carrots to Campbell for 30 dollars a ton and whatever carrots. If Campbell didn’twant them then Wentz could sell those other carrots to other farmers with Campbell permission.The contract also in Campbell favor expressed the 50 dollars per ton if Wentz broke the contract.However, the reason the court refused to help Campbell enforce the contract is that the contractdid not work in the favor both party since it showed that Campbell had full control and as statedthe, that if Campbell refuse the carrots the Wentz needed Campbell permission to sell to anotherwhich the court found unfair. In essence, if Campbell would have made a fair contract withWentz, the contract could have to stand up in court.Response 2 (Cornelius Clemons)Cornelis, your post is awesome. I agree that the Wentzes did not perform under the
