Facts: In action involving workplace exposure to asbestos-containing product, plaintiff appealed from order entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert W. Sweet, J., 827 F.Supp. 1014, granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of defendant and disposing of various post trial motions. Appeals were taken. The Court of Appeals, José A. Cabranes, Circuit Judge, held that: (1) Supreme Court's decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469, did not alter standard for judgment as a matter of law; (2) district court improperly undertook weighing of scientific evidence, including epidemiological evidence, in granting judgment as matter of law, and evidence was sufficient to create jury questions; (3) evidence supported finding that prime contractors and subcontractor responsible for actual spraying of asbestos fireproofing were on notice
This is the end of the preview.
access the rest of the document.