ssd-variance

ssd-variance - Second Order Stochastic Dominance Definition...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Second Order Stochastic Dominance Definition Suppose the random variables X and Y have support on [ l, u ]. Then X second-order stochastically dominates Y if Z a l Pr[ X > t ] dt ≥ Z a l Pr[ Y > t ] dt for all a . Results 1. If X first order stochastically dominates Y , then X second-order stochastically dom- inates Y . Proof. If X first order stochastically dominates Y , then Pr[ X > t ] ≥ Pr[ Y > t ] for all t . Integrating both sides over t gets the desired result. 2. If X second-order stochastically dominates Y , then E [ X ] ≥ E [ Y ]. Proof. Recall that E [ X ] = l + Z u l [1- F ( t )] dt By second order stochatic dominance, this is greater than E [ Y ] = l + Z u l [1- G ( t )] dt 3. X second-order stochastically dominates Y if and only if E [ h ( X )] ≥ E [ h ( Y )] for all increasing and concave function h . Proof. Let h ( t ) = t if t ≤ a a if t > a 1 Obviously h is increasing and concave. Now, E [ h ( X )] = Z a l tf ( t ) dt + Z u a af ( t ) dt = [- t (1- F ( t ))]...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/01/2008 for the course ECON 3330 taught by Professor Mbiekop during the Spring '08 term at Cornell.

Page1 / 3

ssd-variance - Second Order Stochastic Dominance Definition...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online