Give personal thought with regards to the article "Visualization That Really Work" By Scott Berinato Sheet1 Rubric for Grading Discussion Board Posts Three Levels of Achievement Criteria Exemplary Proficient Developing Unacceptable
Overall Quality and Substance of Post: Up to 60 Points The quality and substance of the post is outstanding. At least two additional sources (besides the textbook) are cited and used to support insights. The length is one page; One Peer reply is present with substantive content. Other students will benefit from the content presented. (56 - 60 points) The quality and substance of the post is good. One other source (besides the textbook) is used to support insights. The length is three-quarters of a page; One peer reply is noted with general comments. This is considered an average level post that meets basic requirements. (51 - 55 points) The quality and substance of the post is too generalized and reads like definitions of key terms and concepts. No sources are used to support insights; Peer reply is vague or not present. The length is one-half page; Insights are needed and the content requires more development. (41-50 points) The quality and substance of the post is either poor or there is no submission. No peer reply present. (0 to 40 points)
Organization and Identification of key terms and concepts: Up to 30 Points At least four key terms/concepts are clearly identified in boldface and directly relate to the original post question and to the associated chapter. Excellent organization and topic flow. (26 to 30 points) At least three key terms/concepts are identified and closely
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 11 pages?
- Spring '19
- Tom Pope