This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
Unformatted text preview: 3. Therefore privacy right does not cover consensual homosexual sodomy GA law has a rational basis: “the personal belief of a majority of the electorate in GA that homosexual sodomy is immoral and unacceptable Reasoning in Lawrence Right to privacy argument 1. Due Process Clauses (5 th and 14 th Amendment) Protect personal liberty 2. Liberty interest includes an interest in formulating and acting on a plan of life. 3. Individual dev. and pursue plans of life through forming personal bond 4. Sexual intimacy may be one element of an enduring personal bonds 5. Therefore, DPC protect rights to form such bonds “Moral nations” do not provide question defensible against for the GA law Our society is going to go to hell, if we allow this behavior and these moral obligations stem from religious beliefs. There is a legal enforcement on morality. But the legal enforcement infringes on liberty. Court must look at the rights of some and the right of privacy....
View Full Document
- Spring '08
- Law, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Lawrence v. Texas, consensual homosexual sodomy, GA law