U4D1.docx - In your unit readings you read about two approaches or models of validity—trinitarian and unitary In some ways these two models are

U4D1.docx - In your unit readings you read about two...

This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 3 pages.

In your unit readings, you read about two approaches or models of validity—trinitarian and unitary. In some ways, these two models are competing views of gathering evidence for a test's validity. In other ways, the two approaches have an overlap of elements. In your post: Compare and contrast these two models in terms of how they conceptualize validity. When applying to a test, Validity is the judgment or estimate of the context that is being measured (Cohen & Swerdlik 2018). When checking the validity of tests, the common phrases used are “acceptable” or “weak” (Cohen & Swerdlik 2018). When using “acceptable” we assume the validity is high and the test is measuring what it’s supposed to and when using “weak” we assume that the validity is low and that it may not be measuring what it’s supposed to. There are two approaches of validity, one is trinitarian and the other is unitary. According to Cohen & Swerdlik (2018), the trinitarian view or “umbrella validity” consists of three categories: content validity, criterion-related validity and construct validity. Content validity is a measure of validity based off the evaluation of things covered in the test (Cohen & Swerdlik 2018). Criterion-related validity is the comparison of different scores of the same test (Cohen & Swerdlik 2018). Finally, construct validity is comprised of how scores relate to other test and scores and how the scores could be understood by the design of the test (Cohen & Swerdlik 2018). These three categories make up the trinitarian view of validity. The unitary view consists of all the validity like the implications of test scores in terms of societal values to the consequences of test used (Cohen & Swerdlik 2018). According to Messick (1995), six aspects of this validity includes content, substantive, structural, generalizability, external and consequential aspects.
Image of page 1
Image of page 2

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 3 pages?

  • Spring '16

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern

Stuck? We have tutors online 24/7 who can help you get unstuck.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask ( soon) You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors