This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: obtained revenue. The marketer filed a lawsuit for breach of contract and damages resulting from the lost profits. The trial court denied the fashion designer's motion for judgment on the pleadings, which was reversed on appeal. On final appeal, the court affirmed the ruling of the trial court, holding that an implied contract existed between the parties. Specifically, the marketer's implied promise to faithfully market the designer's products amounted to fair consideration creating performance obligations by both parties. The court reversed the judgment on the grounds that the marketer gave valuable consideration by promising effective marketing and the splitting of profits pursuant to an implied contract....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at University of Arizona- Tucson.
- Spring '08