This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: provision put Graham at a disadvantage. ISSUE: Whether the adhesion contract falls w/in the reasonable expectations of the weaker “adhering” party and if so if considered in its context is it unduly oppressive or unconscionable. HELD: Yes, the arbitration clause was w/in reasonable expectations of Graham, and No, the presence of a bias arbitrator made the contract unconscionable. RULE: An adhesion contract must fall w/in the reasonable expectations of the weaker “adhering” party and not be unduly oppressive or unconscionable in context to be enforceable....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at Arizona.
- Spring '08