This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: settlement. D objected on the ground that the writings did not satisfy the Statute of Frauds b/c there was no signature from the D. The trial ct found for D and P appeals. Whether an attorney can bind his client without written authorization. Yes. Client and attorney are treated as one unit in this case, so the actions of the clients attorney were sufficient to contractually bind the D to an agreement. If the attorney has the permission of the client to proceed with negotiations, the actions of the attorney are binding to the client....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at University of Arizona- Tucson.
- Spring '08