This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: based on reliance and D.’s nonperformance. Judgement ws awarded to P. and D. appeals. Whether the promise necessary to sustain a cause of action for promissory estoppel must embrace all essential details of a proposed transaction between promisor and promisee so as to be the equivalent of an offer that would result in a binding contract between the parties if the promisee were to accept the same. No. Reliance by prommisory estoppel does not have to contain all of the necessary elements to form a contract. Only; reliance, detriment, injustice unless damages are granted, and forseeability of reliance by P....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at Arizona.
- Spring '08