{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

In re Arbitration btwn Acadia & Irving

In re Arbitration btwn Acadia & Irving - extend the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Page: 279 Class Notes Case: Court / Date: Judge: Facts: Issue: Holding: Rule: In re Arbitration b/w Acadia Co. & Irving Edlitz Ct. of App. NY (1960) Acadia Co. had employed D from July 1957 to Jan 1958 pursuant to a written employment agreement. In July ’58, agreement was extended 6 mos. orally. Early termination resulted in this suit. Special term denied motion to compel arbitration reasoning that the arbitration clause in the original written agreement had expired despite the oral agreement to
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: extend the contract. Ct. of appeals reversed the order stating that the oral extension of the contract was valid because it was based on identical terms of the written agreement. Whether the an extension of an employment contract need by in writing to be enforceable if no terms of the original agreement are changed. No, an oral extension is a good extension....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}