This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: release some of the land, but Johnson refused. McEnroe claimed that offer had expired and that he would not convey the balance of the property. Johnson Farms sued for spec. per. of the land. Johnson farms asserted that partial performance had taken the transaction out of the statute of frauds, and requested a return of part of the purchase price due to relative value of the land conveyed in comparison to total land value. Trial ct. granted summary judgement to the McEnroes claiming that there was not suff evidence on part of Johnson Farms of the oral extension. Ct. of app said that if Johnson Farms can prove the oral agreement falls w/in the statute of frauds, it is entitled to spec perfor....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at University of Arizona- Tucson.
- Spring '08