This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: proceedings to abate the nonconforming use of the building. Kannavos brought a bill in equity to rescind the purchase. The trial ct granted the rescission and Mrs. Annino Appealed. Ct. of appeals found there was fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of the D. ISSUE: Whether the statements made by the vendors in their advertising and otherwise take the case out of the rule of nonliability for bare nondisclosure as set out in Swinton. HELD: Yes. P was entitled to rescind. RULE: If gives reference to a given point of information concerning a contract, voluntarily or per request, they are bound to speak honestly and to divulge all the material facts bearing upon the point that lie within his knowledge....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at University of Arizona- Tucson.
- Spring '08