Kirksey v Kirsey - Shortly after 2 years later he forced...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Case: KIRKSEY v. KIRKSEY Class Notes Court / Date: Judge: Facts: Issue: Holding: Procedural History: Rule: Rationale: Sup Ct of AL Ormond D. told P. that she could move her family to his land and that he would give them a house and land to cultivate. P. left her place of residence and moved to D.’s property, where he gave her land and a house as promised.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Shortly after 2 years later he forced her to leave. P. sued for breach of contract (I assume). Verdict was given to P. D. appealed. Whether or not there was sufficient consideration for a contract. No. Promise was deemed as a gift. Reversed...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at University of Arizona- Tucson.

Page1 / 2

Kirksey v Kirsey - Shortly after 2 years later he forced...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online