This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: 3) Equates “different” with “additional”, and makes the outcome turn on whether the new terms of acceptance are materially different from the terms in the offer- in which case they operate as proposals, so that the offeror’s terms prevail unless he agrees to the varient terms in the acceptance. “leading minority view” The ct. adopted the majority view, noting that they would have preferred the “leading minority view”, but that they thought it would be reversed by a superior court. Whether the terms of the original offer should be binding, or the therms of the acceptance (containing additional or different terms) should hold. Affirmed See facts....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at Arizona.
- Spring '08