United Mine Workers v

United Mine Workers v - Tenn state law conspiracy claim...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
United Mine Workers v. Gibbs U.S. Supreme Ct. (1966) J. Brennan P.244 FACTS: Mr. Gibbs held leases with various mines and contracts with to haul coal for the mines. After a dispute with local labor unions, he began to loose his leases and contracts. Gibbs believed that his loss of contracts was due to a concerted union plan against him. He filed suit in the US District court of the Eastern District of Tenn. Gibbs filed two claims; one claim arose under the Federal Labor Management Relations Act and one was a
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Tenn. state law conspiracy claim. ISSUE: Whether the District Court properly entertained supplemental jurisdiction of the claim based on Tenn. law. HELD: Yes, Pendent or supplemental jurisdiction exists whenever there is a federal claim that is directly related to a state claim and the federal claim has sufficient substance to confer subject matter jurisdiction on the Court under Article 3 § 2 of the Constitution. The state and federal claim must derive from a common nucleus....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online