This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: last note from the D constituted a binding contract. The Ct of app held that the trial judge erred in his instruction to the jury, and that the P was required to submit a form of acceptance before the contract was formed. Whether or not a contract existed b/w the 2 parties. A contract did not exist. Reversed and new trial ordered. A mental determination not indicated by speech or put in course of indication by act to the other party, is not an acceptance which will bind the other....
View Full Document
- Spring '08
- D. D.