This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: last note from the D constituted a binding contract. The Ct of app held that the trial judge erred in his instruction to the jury, and that the P was required to submit a form of acceptance before the contract was formed. Whether or not a contract existed b/w the 2 parties. A contract did not exist. Reversed and new trial ordered. A mental determination not indicated by speech or put in course of indication by act to the other party, is not an acceptance which will bind the other....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at University of Arizona- Tucson.
- Spring '08