Williams v

Williams v - defaulted on but also previous items Williams...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. US Ct of App Dis of Col (1965) p. 403 J. Skelly FACTS: Walker-Thomas sold furniture to appellants and accepted payment installments in the form of lease payments for the items until they were paid for. Once paid for they transferred the title of the goods. In the case of default, W-T could repossess. Not only could they repossess the item
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: defaulted on, but also previous items. Williams was on welfare, and W-T was aware of this, yet sold her a $500 stereo. ISSUE: Whether a contract for repossession is enforceable when the merchant is aware of a financial disadvantage of the consumer. HELD: Yes. UCC 2-302 says the inequality of a bargaining position exploited by a merchant is unconscionable....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 06/15/2009 for the course LAW 577 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at Arizona.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online