worrior.docx - Title (capitalize each word) TITLE IN CAPS...

This preview shows page 1 - 4 out of 17 pages.

The preview shows page 2 - 4 out of 17 pages.
Title (capitalize each word)1TITLE IN CAPSStudent’s NameCourseTutorUniversityCity (State)Date
Title (capitalize each word)2IntroductionThe Ideas of War, Conflict vs Peace and stability has been in question across different socialstructures across time. These ideas and definition of what was perceived right or wrong was alsostrongly subjective to particular groups or situations across different societies, those differencesin opinion that causes the disagreement can bring in its extreme to the escalation of a conflictthat will potentally require more sophistocated methods of action/resources , where one of themis the use of Warriors instead of soldiers. Firstly, I will be attempt to explain and evaluatecritically the multi-dimensional nature of war and terror, based around existing theories offunctionalism, conflict and interactionism.Secondly, I will critically analyse and evaluate theidea of Warrior, what does it mean to be a modern Warrior, its qualities in the present and thepast, training processes, gender, technology. Third, will be talking about the potential usage ofWarrior in the contemporary conflict such as; War on Terror and the usage of different militarymethods in order to achieve a desired outcome. Lastly, I will conclude my essay by giving mycritical opinion and evaluation based on my research about the idea of Warrior.Persectibves of war and terrorThe Functionalist perspective on War and Terror focuses more on positive aspects of Warand Terror, where ‘certain behaviors and social institutions’ play a useful role in conductingsuccessful operations at the time of Warfare. Robert E. Park, (1941) one of the first sociologiststo publish essay called ‘The Social Function of War: Observations and Notes’ Where he explains
Title (capitalize each word)3the complexity and functions of War. Park (1941) First claim is that ‘war helps resolveinternational disputes over matters such as terrirtoral boundaries and religious and otherideologies’. Second claim being ‘War generates a stronger sense of social bonding and solidaritywithin the societies that are at war’. Third claim being ‘development of nation-state overtribalism helps developing stronger integration of races and people’ where ‘the size and resourcesof insitutionalized nation-state gives greater scientific, cultural and political advantages’ for thefuture prosperity of that newly created or modified state. One of the final positive functions ofwar described by Functionalists is the increase in military job opportunities as well as incredibleincrease in scientific and technological research that can contribute to the development ofproducts and services across different industries other than milita. It cannot be simply dismissedthat one of the major reasons of War, Terrorism or Conflict is the scenario of humandisagreement, where two sides disagree on key or elementary idea/function of society or societyin general. One of the most current actions against War and Terror today is based around

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

End of preview. Want to read all 17 pages?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Fall
Professor
Agnes shark

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture