Philosophy 426 Notes

# Philosophy 426 Notes - Philosophy 426 Notes Minkowski...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Philosophy 426 Notes Minkowski Spacetime: o The points of spacetime will be all the locations of possible ideal events o Spacetime is the set of all events o Pre-relativistic: An event is specified by where and when it took place o Structure radically different from Newtonian spacetime: It is not meaningful to ask for the temporal separation between two events or the spatial separation o Minkowski spacetime has four dimensions o Do no discuss the distances between events but rather the interval between them o Interval is not a distance o Fundamental assumption of relativistic theories is that there are no such faster-than-light signals, spacelike-seperated events have no possible causal signal connecting them at all Gauss – All an empirical question which geometry to use; empirical not a priori o Geometry is only an empirical matter once we’ve chosen our convention Riemann’s Spherical Geometry – no parallels to a single line; a triangle will always be greater than two right triangles, maximum 3 straight lines Hyperbolic Geometry – also that of constant curvature; through a point outside a line there is an infinity of lines that are parallel to a given line Relative Consistence Proof – To show a set of axioms are consistent, must prove you can’t derive a contradiction Lobachevskian Geometry: o ‘point’ – point inside the bounding circle o ‘line’ – chord of this circle excluding endpoints o ‘parallel lines’ – chords of the circle that don’t intersect o All Euclidean theorems come out true, so Lobachevskian geometry is consistant o Each axiom of Lobachevskian plane geometry translates into a theorem of Euclidean geometry Poincare – Empirical observations can be wrong o The choice of the geometry to describe the world is simply a matter of convenience; is true by convention and not by how the world is

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
o Geometries are true by convention but are meaningless empirically o Geometry is analytic a priori o Euclidean geometry is intrinsically simpler than other geometries Though sometimes better to use more complex geometry and simpler physics Richenbach – Considered himself an empiricist against Poincare’s conventionalism (knew about Riemannian geometry) Reichenbach’s a conventionalist o Discussed Riemannian geometry; said finding out the true geometry is an empirical question o Can use the earth to find out geometries of the earth, you should therefore be able to do the
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 04/02/2008 for the course PHIL 426 taught by Professor Heary during the Spring '08 term at Arizona.

### Page1 / 6

Philosophy 426 Notes - Philosophy 426 Notes Minkowski...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online