BSP1702 - Seminar 9 - Product Liability.pdf - DEALING WITH PRODUCT LIABILITY SEMINAR 9 Jeanette Ng [email protected] NO FORM OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING

BSP1702 - Seminar 9 - Product Liability.pdf - DEALING WITH...

This preview shows page 1 - 11 out of 61 pages.

DEALING WITH PRODUCT LIABILITY SEMINAR 9 Jeanette Ng [email protected] NO FORM OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING IS ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION
Image of page 1
(a) Was there a breach of the tenancy agreement? (b) IF there was a breach, and there are no relevant express terms:was the mall closure for a few days, a fundamental breachof the tenancy agreementwhich will allow the tenants to immediately terminate the tenancy? (c) What damagescan they sue for? 2 RECAP of LAST WEEK – Remedies
Image of page 2
Statutes Sale of Goods Act – for businesses + consumers Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act – Lemon Law for consumers Unfair Contract Terms Act Contract Express terms Implied terms: Case law Tort (Duty of Care – Negligence) 3 Seminar 5 - today’s Seminar 9 o Statutes eg. SGA, CPFTA o Courts o Customs Seminar 10 ** Additional Implied terms Many others, depending on category of goods eg. food, vehicles, medical devices
Image of page 3
(1) Product Liability There is an important statute governing product liability: the Sale of Goods Act (SGA). The SGA is important, as among other things, it implies various terms into a contract for the sale of goods : o see Seminar 5 – Terms of Contract (implied terms) These implied terms offer protection to buyers. Does this include businesses? 4
Image of page 4
5
Image of page 5
Overview of S G A Section 13 – Goods must correspond with description o Regardless of whether it was sold in the course of business o Buyer must have relied on the description 6 ** Additional Where does the description come from? Possible to also sue for Misrepresentation (does not match with stated description).
Image of page 6
Overview of S G A Section 14(2) – Goods must be satisfactory quality o Safety, appearance, durability etc o Seller must have been sold in the course of business o Exception : buyer examined the goods prior to purchase OR the defect was brought to buyer’s attention 7 S14(2A) TEST : whether a reasonable person would consider it satisfactory having regard to the price , description and all other relevant circumstances eg. appearance and finish, minor defects, durability issues, and safety issues. ** Additional $1.99 @ Daisho versus $199 @ Isetan Example #1 Example #2
Image of page 7
Overview of S G A Section 14(3) – Goods must be reasonably fit for purpose o Purpose expressly made known to seller o Implied purpose o Seller must have sold in the course of business o Exception : buyer did not rely on seller’s judgement OR it was unreasonable for buyer to rely on seller’s judgement 8 ** Additional
Image of page 8
9 ** Additional Section 13 – Description? Section 14(3) - Fit for Purpose? Section 14(2) - Satisfactory Quality?
Image of page 9
10 ** Additional (cont’d) His intended purpose of sound and vibration-free car was not expressly made known. Overall fit for purpose, as a luxury vehicle.
Image of page 10
Image of page 11

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 61 pages?

  • Spring '18
  • -
  • SGA

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture