This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Craig v. Moren (1976) 7 -2 o This case clears the scrutiny level for sex. o Lower age standard for women to buy beer. o Applied an Intermediate level of scrutiny. o Equal protection is higher on the list than what the legislature may believe Gedulgid v. Aielio (1974) pregnancy classifications 6 3 o Biological Difference for the tree cases o Not sexual discrimination, its against condition of person. Should men and women be considered under sexual discrimination even if one sex is involved. Michael M. v. Superior Court (1981) 5 - 4 o Male can be punished for statutory rape for consensual or non consensual sex of the underage female. Law only punishes males. Law is upheld o Reynquist Ya it makes sense o Out modded sexual stereotypes. Rostker v. Goldberg (1981) o Men challeneged the constitutionalty of the draft. o Supreme court overturned the claim saying it was unconstitutional o It is constitutional to draft only men o...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 07/01/2009 for the course GOV 312L taught by Professor Madrid during the Summer '07 term at University of Texas at Austin.
- Summer '07