DNA matches aren't always a lock 1

DNA matches aren't always a lock 1 - Los Angeles Times DNA...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
05/04/2008 07:41 PM Los Angeles Times: DNA matches aren't always a lock Page 1 of 6 http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-adme-dna4-2008may04,0,6366463,print.story http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-adme-dna4-2008may04,0,2692863.story From the Los Angeles Times DNA matches aren't always a lock Genetic evidence is widely viewed as ironclad. In 'cold hit' cases, however, the truth is often elusive. By Jason Felch and Maura Dolan Los Angeles Times Staff Writers May 4, 2008 Police found the naked body of Diana Sylvester near her Christmas tree. The 22-year-old San Francisco nurse had been sexually assaulted and stabbed in the heart. She lay on her back, her neck laced with scratches and her mouth open as if frozen in a scream. For more than three decades, Sylvester's slaying went unsolved. Then, in 2004, a search of California's DNA database of criminal offenders yielded an apparent breakthrough: Badly deteriorated DNA from the assailant's sperm was linked to John Puckett, an obese, wheelchair-bound 70-year-old with a history of rape. The DNA "match" was based on fewer than half of the genetic markers typically used to connect someone to a crime, and there was no other physical evidence. Puckett insisted he was innocent, saying that although DNA at the crime scene happened to match his, it belonged to someone else. At Puckett's trial earlier this year, the prosecutor told the jury that the chance of such a coincidence was 1 in 1.1 million. Jurors were not told, however, the statistic that leading scientists consider the most significant: the probability that the database search had hit upon an innocent person. In Puckett's case, it was 1 in 3. The case is emblematic of a national problem, The Times has found. Prosecutors and crime labs across the country routinely use numbers that exaggerate the significance of DNA matches in "cold hit" cases, in which a suspect is identified through a database search. Jurors are often told that the odds of a coincidental match are hundreds of thousands of times more remote than they actually are, according to dozens of interviews with leading scientific and legal authorities, a comprehensive review of scientific and academic papers in the field and court documents in cold hit cases. Two national scientific committees, including the FBI's DNA advisory board, have recommended portraying the odds more conservatively. But interviews with expert witnesses and DNA analysts from crime labs across the country show that few if any have adopted that approach. The FBI lab, which oversees the nation's offender databases, has disregarded the recommendation of its own advisory board, bureau officials acknowledged. So far, the courts have ruled in law enforcement's favor on this issue.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 6

DNA matches aren't always a lock 1 - Los Angeles Times DNA...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online