Student St V Barraza

Student St V Barraza - • Key pieces of evidence – •...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Page 1 of 1 Outline for “State V. Barraza” Case Summary: Key players, relationships between them – Players’ key statements/actions – Attorneys’ perspectives – 1. Why prosecutor Sam Myers felt a charge of first degree murder was appropriate – 2. Why defense attorney Chad Shell decided to not introduce evidence of Mayra’s prior victimization into the trial –
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: • Key pieces of evidence – • Mayra’s intentions/ actions re: stabbing of victim – • Jury deliberations/verdict – • Sentencing factors – 1. Chivalry/paternalism hypothesis – 2. Evil woman hypothesis – 3. Equal treatment hypothesis – 4. Did Mayra’s gender affect her sentencing? How? • Defendant’s sentence –...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/02/2008 for the course SOC 101 taught by Professor Sullivan during the Fall '08 term at ASU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online