FE_fa94_commented_mt2

FE_fa94_commented_mt2 - CSE 420/598 FALL 1994 FINAL EXAM...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: CSE 420/598 FALL 1994 FINAL EXAM NAME Put Name on Every Page 1. (15) Performance Assume the 5 stage pipeline with a structural hazard shown below. Suppose that data references constitute 25% of the mix and that ideal CPI of the pipelined machine, ignoring the structural hazard, is 1.3. Question included a figure like figure A.5. Question is relevant. (a) (5) What is the speedup of this machine over an unpipelined machine if there were no structural hazards? Question is relevant. (b) (10) Disregarding any other performance losses, how much faster is the ideal machine without the memory structural hazard, versus the machine with the hazard? Question is relevant. 2. (6) Pipeline Performance Give two reasons why increasing the depth of a pipeline does not always increase performance Question is relevant. 1)Pipelining increases the CPU instruction throughput but it does not reduce the execution time of an individual instruction, in fact usually increases the execution time of each instruction due to overhead.individual instruction, in fact usually increases the execution time of each instruction due to overhead....
View Full Document

Page1 / 3

FE_fa94_commented_mt2 - CSE 420/598 FALL 1994 FINAL EXAM...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online