practice-final-solns

practice-final-solns - MATH 110 - SOLUTIONS TO PRACTICE...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MATH 110 - SOLUTIONS TO PRACTICE FINAL LECTURE 1, SUMMER 2009 GSI: SANTIAGO CA ˜ NEZ 1. Axler, 6.18 (Hint: By 6.17 it is enough to show that every vector in null P is orthogonal to every vector in range P — use 6.2 to show this) Proof. First, we know that P is the projection operator corresponding to the decomposition V = range P ⊕ null P. Let u ∈ range P and w ∈ null P . We must show that h u,w i = 0. Now, for any a ∈ F . we have P ( u + aw ) = u since aw ∈ null P . Thus k u k ≤ k u + aw k for any scalar a by the assumption that k Pv k ≤ k v k for any v . By problem 6.2, this implies that h u,w i = 0 as required. We conclude that P is an orthogonal projection by problem 6.17. 2. Axler, 6.20 Proof. Suppose that U and U ⊥ are T-invariant. To show that P U T = TP U , we must show that both sides give the same result when applied to an arbitrary v ∈ V . To this end, let v ∈ V and write it as v = u + w according to the decomposition V = U ⊕ U ⊥ . Then Tu ∈ U and Tw ∈ U ⊥ since U and U ⊥ are T-invariant. Thus P U T ( v ) = P U ( Tu + Tw ) = Tu and TP U ( v ) = T ( P U ( u + w )) = Tu, so P U T = TP U as required. Conversely, suppose that P U T = TP U . Let u ∈ U and w ∈ U ⊥ . We must show that Tu ∈ U and Tw ∈ U ⊥ . We have P U T ( u + w ) = P U ( Tu + Tw ) and TP U ( u + w ) = T ( P U ( u + w )) = Tu. For these to be equal means that Tu itself is the piece of Tu + Tw which is in U and that Tw must then be in U ⊥ . Hence U and U ⊥ are T-invariant as claimed. 3. Suppose that V is an inner-product space and that U and W are subspaces of V . Show that U ⊆ W if and only if W ⊥ ⊆ U ⊥ . Date : August 6, 2009. 2 GSI: SANTIAGO CA ˜ NEZ Proof. Suppose that U ⊆ W and let v ∈ W ⊥ . Then h v,w i = 0 for any w ∈ W . In particular then, since U ⊆ W , h v,u i = 0 for any u ∈ U . Thus w ∈ U ⊥ so W ⊥ ⊆ U ⊥ . Conversely, suppose that W ⊥ ⊆ U ⊥ . By what we just shown, we have ( U ⊥ ) ⊥ ⊆ ( W ⊥ ) ⊥ , and hence U ⊆ W since taking two orthogonal complements gives back the original space. 4. Suppose that S and T are self-adjoint operators on an inner-product space V . Show that ST is self-adjoint if and only if S and T commute....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/31/2009 for the course MATH 110 taught by Professor Gurevitch during the Spring '08 term at Berkeley.

Page1 / 5

practice-final-solns - MATH 110 - SOLUTIONS TO PRACTICE...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online