101A_lec3 - Economics 101A (Lecture 3) Stefano DellaVigna...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Economics 101A (Lecture 3) Stefano DellaVigna January 27, 2009
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Outline 1. Implicit Function Theorem II 2. Envelope Theorem 3. Convexity and concavity 4. Constrained Maximization
Background image of page 2
1 Implicit function theorem II Multivariate implicit function theorem (Dini) : Consider a set of equations ( f 1 ( p 1 ,...,p n ; x 1 ,...,x s )= 0; ... ; f s ( p 1 n ; x 1 s )=0 ), and a point ( p 0 ,x 0 ) solution of the equation. Assume: 1. f 1 ,...,f s continuous and di f erentiable in a neigh- bourhood of ( p 0 ,x 0 ) ; 2. The following Jakobian matrix f x evaluated at ( p 0 ,x 0 ) has determinant di f erent from 0: f x = ∂f 1 ∂x 1 1 s ... ... ... s 1 ... s ∂xs
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Then: 1 .The reisoneandon lyseto ffunct ions x = g ( p ) de f ned in a neighbourhood of p 0 that satisfy f ( p, g ( p )) = 0 and g ( p 0 )= x 0 ; 2. The partial derivative of x i with respect to p k is ∂g i ∂p k = det μ ( f 1 ,...,f s ) ( x 1 ,...x i 1 ,p k ,x i +1 ...,x s ) det ³ f x ´
Background image of page 4
Example 2 (continued): Max h ( x 1 ,x 2 )= p 1 x 2 1 + p 2 x 2 2 2 x 1 5 x 2 f.o.c. x 1 :2 p 1 x 1 2=0= f 1 ( p,x ) f.o.c. x 2 p 2 x 2 5=0= f 2 ( p,x ) Comparative statics of x 1 with respect to p 1 ? First compute det ³ f x ´ ∂f 1 ∂x 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 = Ã!
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Then compute det μ ( f 1 ,...,f s ) ( x 1 ,...x i 1 ,p k ,x i +1 ...,x s ) ∂f 1 ∂p 1 1 ∂x 2 2 1 2 2 = Ã! Finally, 1 1 = Why did you compute det ³ f x ´ already?
Background image of page 6
2 Envelope Theorem Ch. 2, pp. 32-36 (33—37, 9th Ed) You now know how x 1 varies if p 1 varies. How does h ( x ( p )) vary as p 1 varies? Di f erentiate h ( x 1 ( p 1 ,p 2 ) ,x 2 ( p 1 2 ) 1 2 ) with respect to p 1 : dh ( x 1 ( p 1 2 ) 2 ( p 1 2 ) 1 2 ) dp 1 = ∂h ( x , p ) ∂x 1 1 ( x , p ) ∂p 1 + ( x , p ) 2 2 ( x , p ) 1 + ( x , p ) 1 The f rst two terms are zero.
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/05/2009 for the course ECON 101a taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Page1 / 21

101A_lec3 - Economics 101A (Lecture 3) Stefano DellaVigna...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 8. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online